The Inner Life

The Modern Teachers

Krishnamurti rejects the guru. Ram Dass makes the guru central. Watts, Tolle, and Gurdjieff disagree about what the self is and how it changes.

A comparison / five teachers / 10 min read

In 1929, Krishnamurti dissolved the organization built to announce him as the World Teacher.

The Theosophical Society had founded the Order of the Star in the East in 1911 and made him its head. Eighteen years later, he told its members at Ommen that their organization could not make them free.

Truth is a pathless landKrishnamurti, dissolution speech, 3 August 1929, excerpt

He distinguished an organization that arranges transport from one that promises spiritual freedom. A steamship can take you somewhere. Belonging to the Order cannot do the inward work for you.

Jiddu Krishnamurti as a young man, a 1920s studio portrait: dark wavy hair, a quiet steady gaze, suit and tie.
Jiddu Krishnamurti as a young man. Bain News Service. Public domain.

Ram Dass made devotion to his guru central to his life. Gurdjieff taught through a school, with exercises and a teacher who could challenge a pupil's habits. Alan Watts offered a change in how you understand yourself. Eckhart Tolle taught a way to notice thoughts without deriving your identity from them. Putting all five under the heading of Eastern wisdom conceals decisions a reader actually has to make.

The selections below compare what each thinks the self is, what each asks you to do, and what authority the teacher claims.


The five

What each teacher asks of you

Choose a name to read a claim and a short passage. Each ends with my question about the teaching or its practice.

Identity

You belong to the world that made you

Watts starts with the feeling that you are a little person inside your body, confronting everything outside it. In The Book, he calls that sense of isolation a mistake. Your breathing, food, and existence depend on processes beyond your skin. He wants that dependence to become part of how being alive feels.

His further claim is that your deepest identity is the reality expressing itself as everything. The book adapts Vedanta, a Hindu philosophical tradition, into Watts's own English. He tells a story in which God plays hide-and-seek by becoming each of us and forgetting who he is. He presents this as a myth that illustrates his account of the self.

Watts taught through books, radio, and recorded talks. His official biography describes his role as a philosophical entertainer and his preference for comparing worldviews over prescribing a single method.

We do not “come into” this world; we come out of it, as leaves from a tree.

The questionWatts's God also plays the part of people in pain. Does calling that a cosmic game explain suffering, or make another person's pain easier to dismiss?

Alan Watts, The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are, preface and chapter 1, “Inside Information.” Read the text.

Devotion and service

The person beside you is part of the practice

Ram Dass was Richard Alpert, a psychologist who encountered Neem Karoli Baba in India. His Be Here Now helped carry meditation and yoga into the American counterculture. The title catches one part of the teaching. His devotion to his guru and his commitment to serving people are just as necessary to understanding it.

He tells a story about trying to read a holy book on a Greyhound bus while resenting the man who sits beside him. He recalls his guru's instruction, puts his attention on the passenger, and talks with him for the trip. The opportunity to practice was the conversation he had been trying to avoid.

He describes serving people as a way of recognizing God in them, beyond the body and personality that attract or annoy you. This is bhakti, devotion expressed through love and service. You can admire the ordinary kindness in the bus story without sharing the belief about God that makes it spiritual practice for Ram Dass.

Love everyone, serve everyone, and remember God.

The questionDoes being present make you more available to another person, or absorbed in monitoring your own state? The bus story asks you to interrupt the second kind of attention.

Neem Karoli Baba's instruction, as recounted by Ram Dass in “Maharajji's Three Teachings.” See also “How to Understand Love, Serve, Remember” and his foundation's biographical account.

Awareness

Notice a thought before making it your identity

Tolle asks you to listen to the running commentary in your head without adding another judgment about it. You can notice a thought about an old argument, then return attention to something happening now. His examples include feeling the water while washing your hands and attending to your breath after getting into a car.

The book identifies this observing presence with your deeper self. It also describes an eternal reality, which Tolle calls Being, accessible when thought becomes quiet. He keeps that spiritual claim even when the instructions sound like a simple attention exercise.

In the introduction, Tolle says that after years of anxiety and suicidal depression, a thought changed his life: “I cannot live with myself any longer.” He wondered which of those selves was real and describes a sudden end to his anguish. That is his account of a private experience.

Thinking and consciousness are not synonymous.

The questionYou can check whether observing a thought changes its grip on your attention. That observation alone cannot establish an eternal self. The grammar of “I” and “myself” doesn't establish two beings either; Tolle treats it as a prompt for discovery.

Eckhart Tolle, The Power of Now, chapter 1, “You Are Not Your Mind,” authorized excerpt; introduction on his official site. Publication record.

Observation without authority

Examine the observer too

Krishnamurti rejects a prescribed path to spiritual freedom. Adopting a teacher's account gives you another set of ideas to repeat. He asks whether you can observe your reactions without explaining them through what you have already been taught.

His example is anger. First there is anger; then a voice says it was justified or should be suppressed. That judge feels like a separate person managing the emotion. Krishnamurti says the judge is made from accumulated experience, the same past that shapes the reaction. His inquiry includes this apparent observer.

Your own judgments may be borrowed too. He asks for observation without naming or condemning what appears. Can you do that without turning his instruction into another rule you enforce against yourself?

The moment you follow someone you cease to follow Truth.

The questionWhen you notice anger, are you already defending the outburst, or imagining yourself as a very calm person? His question reaches the person doing the noticing.

J. Krishnamurti, dissolution speech, 3 August 1929; “The Observer Is the Past,” excerpt from To Be Human.

Attention and discipline

The person making the promise may not keep it

Gurdjieff's example is the person who decides at night to rise early, then refuses in the morning. P.D. Ouspensky records his explanation: different desires take turns saying “I.” We mistake these changing reactions for a person with a stable will.

One exercise is self-remembering: keeping attention on yourself and on what you observe at the same time. Ouspensky describes trying it while walking through St. Petersburg. He repeatedly forgets the exercise. That failure lets him see a limit in attention that he had previously taken for granted.

The wider method is the Fourth Way: working on body, feelings, and thought together while living an ordinary life. It involves sustained work with other people. Hugh Ripman, a pupil of Ouspensky, explains this as developing consciousness and psychological integration. The book also claims that the Moon feeds on organic life on Earth. “Wake up” comes with a cosmology.

Man is a machine.

The questionCompare your intention at bedtime with the one you have when the alarm rings. What changed, and did you notice it before the decision?

Gurdjieff, as recorded by P.D. Ouspensky in In Search of the Miraculous, chapters 1 to 3, 5, and 7. Read the account. The quote is from chapter 1.


The differences

They leave you with different instructions

The phrase “be present” doesn't decide what to do when someone annoys you. Ram Dass's bus story directs attention toward the other person. Tolle gives you a way to attend to the thought without identifying with it. Krishnamurti asks you to examine the observer's judgment too. These can overlap in practice, but they explain the work differently.

The disagreement about a teacher is harder to combine. Ram Dass's guru remains a source of instruction and devotion. Krishnamurti treats inward dependence on an authority as an obstacle to freedom. Gurdjieff's work requires a school because a person's habits keep escaping their own notice. You cannot adopt all three views of authority without changing at least one of them.

Watts's universal Self, Tolle's observing presence, and Gurdjieff's project of developing a stable will also give you different expectations. Finding what was always there and acquiring something through work are different accounts of spiritual change.

Calling all of this Buddhist “not-self” creates another confusion. In the Discourse on the Not-self Characteristic, SN 22.59, the Buddha includes consciousness among the changing things that should not be identified as self. That passage does not give us Watts's universal Self merely by denying an isolated ego. The word “self” needs an explanation each time it changes traditions.


Trust

The teacher's conduct belongs in the evidence

A teacher's conduct matters most when the claim is about a changed life. If freedom from possessiveness is supposed to change relationships, those relationships are relevant evidence. A sentence that sounds convincing cannot answer questions about how a teacher uses the trust placed in them.

Radha Rajagopal Sloss described Krishnamurti's long secret relationship with her mother, Rosalind, who was married to his associate D. Rajagopal. In a 1991 interview about her memoir, she said her concern centered on the deceit. Her family was directly involved. The account gives a serious reason to question the image of Krishnamurti as a man whose insight had resolved his personal attachments.

Ouspensky's separation from Gurdjieff is documented in his own account. By its final chapter he says he could not understand the direction of Gurdjieff's work or find a place in it. He announced in 1924 that his London work would continue independently. Keeping the system did not require him to pretend that working with its teacher had succeeded.

Illness is a different kind of evidence. After his stroke, Ram Dass wrote about accepting dependence on caregivers while still suffering. The excerpt from Still Here presents the perspective of the soul as help he used within that condition. His account makes room for continuing difficulty; it doesn't show that practice grants immunity from it.

Tolle's observing presence and Krishnamurti's inquiry into the observer leave a specific question unresolved. If both approaches quiet the inner argument, how would you tell whether a deeper witness has been discovered or the division between observer and thought has loosened? Feeling peaceful after reading a passage doesn't decide between those explanations.


The texts

Sources and scope

The comparison follows the passages listed here. Quotations are short excerpts with their wording retained. Krishnamurti's speech, Ram Dass's stories, and Ouspensky's memoir establish what these people said or reported; they do not independently verify a spiritual attainment. Official biographies describe the work from within its supporting organizations.

Texts and personal accounts
  1. Krishnamurti, dissolution speech. Ommen, 3 August 1929. The foundation's headnote dates the Order's founding to 1911; the speech repeats eighteen years of preparation. Both excerpts on this page are from this text. Full speech.
  2. Watts, The Book (1966). Preface and chapter 1, “Inside Information.” The leaf comparison and the story of God's hide-and-seek belong to his adaptation of Vedanta. The linked transcription identifies its Abacus edition. Text.
  3. Alan Watts Organization. Biographical account of the books, broadcasts, and the role of philosophical entertainer. Biography.
  4. Ram Dass, “Maharajji's Three Teachings.” The Greyhound story and the instruction attributed to Neem Karoli Baba. Essay.
  5. Ram Dass, “How to Understand Love, Serve, Remember.” Service explained through devotion and recognizing God in other people. Essay.
  6. Love Serve Remember Foundation. Biographical account, including Richard Alpert, Neem Karoli Baba, Be Here Now (1971), devotional practice, and service projects. Biography.
  7. Tolle, The Power of Now, chapter 1. “You Are Not Your Mind,” including Being, observing thought, and attention to routine activities. SoulfulLiving identifies this as a New World Library authorized excerpt. Excerpt.
  8. Tolle, The Power of Now, introduction. The awakening account, posted on his official site. Excerpt. Library record for the 1997 first publication and 1999 New World Library edition.
  9. Krishnamurti, “The Observer Is the Past.” Excerpt from To Be Human, on anger and the observer formed by memory. Text.
  10. Gurdjieff through Ouspensky. In Search of the Miraculous (1949), chapters 1 to 3, 5, and 7 for the teaching; chapter 18 for the separation. The account is Ouspensky's recollection and explanation, rather than a verbatim transcript. Hugh Ripman's 1976 public lecture explains the Fourth Way from a pupil's perspective. Ouspensky's book.
  11. The Buddhist comparison. SN 22.59, the Discourse on the Not-self Characteristic, translated from Pali by Thanissaro Bhikkhu. Translation.
  12. Accounts of private life. Radha Rajagopal Sloss, interviewed by Helen Tworkov, Tricycle, Winter 1991, about Lives in the Shadow with J. Krishnamurti. Interview. Ram Dass's account of aging and his stroke in Still Here, foundation excerpt.