How to Think, and What's Real

Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau

A condemned prisoner may resist execution even in Hobbes's absolute state. His agreement to be governed has a limit. Locke and Rousseau draw theirs elsewhere.

3 thinkers / 5 questions / 12 min complete read

Scroll

The agreements, in plain English

Hobbes allows a condemned prisoner to fight the executioner. The sovereign may rightfully impose death; the prisoner still has the liberty to resist. Chapter 21 of Leviathan holds these positions together. Absolute political authority does not erase the need to preserve your own life.

Locke allows the people to replace a government that attacks their rights. Rousseau requires citizens to make their own laws, then permits force against those who refuse their common obligations. Each book asks when a decision you oppose can legitimately bind you.

Their contracts ask which rights and duties exist before a government can claim obedience. They supply no evidence of an actual agreement signed by the founders of every state. Rousseau's conjectural history of society belongs chiefly to his earlier Discourse on Inequality.

The five questions below pair my explanations with excerpts from each author. Use the tabs or arrow keys to move. Each excerpt links to its chapter.

Question 1
loading the three thinkers…

Where the text comes from

The fifteen excerpts retain the wording of these digital editions, including Hobbes's older spelling and capitals. An excerpt may start or end within a sentence; read its chapter for the complete argument.

The card uses the 1651 frontispiece of Leviathan, a crowned figure composed of smaller human figures. The engraving is attributed to Abraham Bosse.